Comment on Amazon hit with $5.9 million fine for violating California labor law
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 week agoIt is still insufficient, but it’s also disingenuous to use the profit of their global operations to say the fine is a small cost of doing business to their California warehouses.
Mkengine@feddit.de 1 week ago
Does the fine have to be paid from profits made in California? If not I don’t see why this is relevant, other than semantics.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 week ago
If it costs a company more to do something than not do it:
Then they won’t do it.
To make a truly genuine argument you would need to use their profit from abuse in warehouses in California, where they were fined.