Comment on Hunter Biden laptop re-emerges as media embarrassment as it becomes key evidence at gun trial

<- View Parent
jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

I’m simply being consistent. Sorry if that’s difficult for you to handle.

You disputed my original statement I’m just to verifying you didn’t know what you’re talking about when you disputed it.

More projection, I’m asking you for your reason as to why Hunter is even relevant, not why should I care.

Replace care with relevant.

Relevance is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s relevant. Further your threshold for relevance is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.

Better?

Even though you still haven’t answered my question. If Hunter is not relevant then why are you so invested.

So why do you care enough to comment here at all?

As I’ve stated before shooting down all your ridiculous claims is entertainment. You make turd time fun.

When have I been dishonest? Please provide examples.

You claim there are good white supremacists.

Again, I’m not asking why should I care, but why Hunter is relevant

I don’t know why he’s relevant to you and I don’t care to find out why, I just know he is.

If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have asked for sources for his emails. If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have disputed those sources. It wasn’t until your 5th reply after sources were provided that you shifted to why is this relevant.

source
Sort:hotnewtop