Comment on Hunter Biden laptop re-emerges as media embarrassment as it becomes key evidence at gun trial

• BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I didn’t dismiss your article, I said it had no proof of anything, which it didn’t. You needed to supplement that article with additional evidence to confirm it was accurate, then I stopped mentioning it, didn’t I?

  I know our threads can be hard to follow sometimes but that’s because you keep deflecting and forgetting the topic.

  There was an impeachment inquiry into Joe based in part by the content of Hunter’s laptop.

  Yes, because the House can do that. 7 months into this inquiry and nothing has happened because there’s no evidence of wrongdoing.

  Since we’re keeping score, TFG had 3 impeachment inquiries, and articles of impeachment.

  Instead of choosing to be ignorant on the matter I followed the proceedings.

  So you’re aware proceedings are still going on because they haven’t been able to find any wrongdoing, yeah?

  I responded because I knew my 100% factual statement correcting the liberal narrative would rile up you and your comrades.

  Who’s riled? I’m simply asking for evidence that neither you nor the house have been able to find for 7 months now. I think you’re the riled one, posturing about it like it matters in the face of 7 months of dead ends.

  Honestly I’m not even mad. It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none.

  source

  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I didn’t dismiss your article, I said it had no proof of anything, which it didn’t. You needed to supplement that article with additional evidence to confirm it was accurate, then I stopped mentioning it, didn’t I?

    It did, they had emails from Hunters laptop. You weren’t one of those idiots that believed it was a Russian hoax were you? It has been know for quite some time that the emails were authentic.

    I know our threads can be hard to follow sometimes but that’s because you keep deflecting and forgetting the topic.

    It’s more you bounce to new things after you’re proved wrong.

    Yes, because the House can do that. 7 months into this inquiry and nothing has happened because there’s no evidence of wrongdoing.

    *No evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

    Further don’t speak on this event like you’re an expert you were totally unaware of the details.

    So you’re aware proceedings are still going on because they haven’t been able to find any wrongdoing, yeah?

    Rember my 1st post when I said Joe hasn’t been implicated… That hasn’t changed with the fact you just learned.

    Who’s riled? I’m simply asking for evidence that neither you nor the house have been able to find for 7 months now. I think you’re the riled one, posturing about it like it matters in the face of 7 months of dead ends.

    It looks like you forgot or are lieing again (my money is on the latter), I never claimed there was evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

    Honestly I’m not even mad. It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry. Otherwise you already would’ve. You’re just deep into the sunk cost fallacy rn and flailing.

    Please show me where I said there’s evidence of wrong doing by Joe? I guess this is what you’re weasling to now, it’s kind of pathetic that you have to make things up.

    source

    • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It did, they had emails from Hunters laptop. You weren’t one of those idiots that believed it was a Russian hoax were you? It has been know for quite some time that the emails were authentic.

      You don’t even have to go as far as calling it a Russian hoax. In April of this year, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee investigating Hunter’s laptop found no wrongdoing. Do you believe the Republican House Committee specially tasked with finding in timing evidence in his emails are also part of the hoax?

      It’s more you bounce to new things after you’re proved wrong.

      Would you rather I double-down on the wrong thing? No wait that’s what Republicans do.

      Further don’t speak on this event like you’re an expert you were totally unaware of the details.

      Wait, what evidence do you have that the House Oversight Committee doesn’t?

      Rember my 1st post when I said Joe hasn’t been implicated… That hasn’t changed with the fact you just learned.

      Good, just checking…

      It looks like you forgot or are lieing again (my money is on the latter), I never claimed there was evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

      Good, so you agree this business with Hunter is irrelevant.

      Please show me where I said there’s evidence of wrong doing by Joe? I guess this is what you’re weasling to now, it’s kind of pathetic that you have to make things up.

      You’re making up an accusation I made about you. I’m simply looking for you to directly address that this is not related to Joe and that Hunter is irrelevant. Why won’t you just state it?

      In other words, would it be more/less/same relevance for me to post an article about some shit one of TFG’s kids may or may not have done?

      source

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        You don’t even have to go as far as calling it a Russian hoax. In April of this year, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee investigating Hunter’s laptop found no wrongdoing. Do you believe the Republican House Committee specially tasked with finding in timing evidence in his emails are also part of the hoax?

        No, the Russian hoax was a false claim that the laptop and the emails were fake. No evidence of wrong doing by Joe does not change the authenticity of the laptop.

        Would you rather I double-down on the wrong thing? No wait that’s what Republicans do.

        You just keep changing the reason you objected to my reply, first it was asking for a source, then the source “didn’t prove shit”, then Hunter confirming emails shut you up about that, then you bounced to its not relivent, now you seem to be arguing that there is no evidence of wrong doing by Joe, which is strange as I’ve been saying that through this thread.

        You’re making up an accusation I made about you.

        Also you

        It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry.

        There’s no reason to lie.

        I’m simply looking for you to directly address that this is not related to Joe and that Hunter is irrelevant. Why won’t you just state it?

        Emails showing Hunter and his buddies trying to set up corrupt deals with Joe isn’t relivent? That’s certainly worth looking into.

        In other words, would it be more/less/same relevance for me to post an article about some shit one of TFG’s kids may or may not have done?

        Who is TFG? If TFG is an elected official and there is evidence of TFGs kids scheming to involve TFG then yes.

        source