Comment on Employees Who Stay In Companies Longer Than Two Years Get Paid 50% Less
henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 months agoPenny wise and pound foolish. They can’t resist the opportunity to exploit, even if it costs the company in the long run.
Comment on Employees Who Stay In Companies Longer Than Two Years Get Paid 50% Less
henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 months agoPenny wise and pound foolish. They can’t resist the opportunity to exploit, even if it costs the company in the long run.
njm1314@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Everyday the idea of an AI CEO sounds less like a joke and more like a great fucking idea.
logi@lemmy.world 5 months ago
At this point it would be most likely to be an LLM which just emulates what it has seen CEOs do in its training data and would do the same sort of thing.
fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 5 months ago
And more like a nightmare for the rest of us.
evranch@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
Hard to see how it could perform any worse, and the wage savings could be allocated to the people actually doing the work.
Yeah sure… The savings would go to buybacks or dividends, of course.
And that’s still a better use of funds than wasting them on an overcompensated CEO.
fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Well the goal of an ideal CEO is to pull more money into the company and give as little out as possible. If we saw more AI CEOs we would just have further wealth disparity in our society and workers at those companies would be paid less as the AI would optimize their pay for maximum company profits. It would be everything we hate about capitalism but amplified, and the person who owned the AI would get paid even more for doing even less.