Not just less useful. They have negative productivity starting out, because training them takes away productive time from there more experienced staff.
Comment on Employees Who Stay In Companies Longer Than Two Years Get Paid 50% Less
HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 months agoAnd even if that guy they hire is really good, there is still a large period of time where that person has to learn the ropes and is most likely less useful than the person who already knew the ins and outs. Also, most of the time, they are never as good…
Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 3 months ago
henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 months ago
Penny wise and pound foolish. They can’t resist the opportunity to exploit, even if it costs the company in the long run.
njm1314@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Everyday the idea of an AI CEO sounds less like a joke and more like a great fucking idea.
logi@lemmy.world 3 months ago
At this point it would be most likely to be an LLM which just emulates what it has seen CEOs do in its training data and would do the same sort of thing.
fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 3 months ago
And more like a nightmare for the rest of us.
evranch@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
Hard to see how it could perform any worse, and the wage savings could be allocated to the people actually doing the work.
Yeah sure… The savings would go to buybacks or dividends, of course.
And that’s still a better use of funds than wasting them on an overcompensated CEO.