Comment

EleventhHour@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

source

Sort:hotnew top

TrenGoblin@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
[deleted]
source
- EleventhHour@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  In the OP I clearly say that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong.
  
  this argument is flawed because
  
  #ephebophelia cannot exist between two adults since
  
  Image
  
  So do you think a 26 year old man being sexually attracted to a 18 or 19 your woman is not a ephebophile?
  
  first, i don’t believe you’re interested in that, or you wouldn’t be here trying to convince everyone it’s ok to fuck kids. but, also:
  
  Straw man
  
  A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.
  
  source
  - TrenGoblin@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    [deleted]
    source
    EleventhHour@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    first, i don’t believe you’re interested in that, or you wouldn’t be here trying to convince everyone it’s ok to fuck kids. but, also:
    
    Straw man
    
    A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.
    
    source