Comment on [deleted]
NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 6 months agoWatch the actual video before your instant qualification? That summary seems AI-generated to me and isn’t even close to faithful to the video
Comment on [deleted]
NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 6 months agoWatch the actual video before your instant qualification? That summary seems AI-generated to me and isn’t even close to faithful to the video
Kissaki@beehaw.org 6 months ago
That’s a problem with the summary though, not with me taking the description seriously.
If your summary misrepresents the video, why include it? It’s gonna do the opposite of what you add it for.
Do you watch every video available? I certainly can’t. So I make use of teasers and descriptions. That’s what they’re there and useful for.
Ilandar@aussie.zone 6 months ago
Before commenting in threads about them, yes. If you’re not going to watch a video or read an article then don’t comment. No one wants to read yet another uneducated opinion that is likely not even related to the actual topic being discussed (since you people only ever read headlines and clickbait titles).
sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 6 months ago
This, a million times this!
NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 6 months ago
Sure, me too, but when you literally say “Instant disqualification for me” that’s an insane reaction. You should know when reading a summary that it’s not a perfect representation of the source. Even human-written summaries or articles very often misunderstand or misrepresent their sources, many times stating the exact opposite of the source because of it. This obviously happens with AI summaries as well. The “instant disqualification” is what you can’t excuse.