Comment

Comment on How common is it for atheists to be against homosexuality/abortion?

Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

I don’t know how common, but I remember enough of middle school to know that just because you’re a budding atheist does not prelude deep homophobia.

source

Sort:hotnew top

tsonfeir@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Or racism.

source
- AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  The American scientific community was all in on eugenics prior to WWII
  
  source
  - Jeredin@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    STIM doesn’t include ethics, psychology, and sociology. It’s amazing how many book-smart people are terrible humans.
    
    source
electrogamerman@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
The thing is, teenagers (usually) are a reflection of what they are taught in their houses. They are not mature enough to have their own opinions.

Better question is, how common is for adult atheists to be against homosexuality/abortion?

source
PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
“Teenage pseudo-intellectual edgelords” is a demographic targeteted for recruitment by the far-right and its a scene that was filled with them decades ago.

So now they’re not racists and sexists, they’re “race realists” and armchair biologists. All it took was a crooked scan of a figure in a published paper.

But there’s no critical thought behind it at all. Give them a list of IQ grouped by race and they’ll declare there are no contributing systemic problems or historical events, black people are just genetically inferior.

There are so many obvious threads to follow.

Scientific ones like “Is IQ actually objective or can you easily be primed and trained for the test?”.

Moral ones like “Should people’s rights and freedoms be decided by their intelligence and if so, why is that being extrapolated from the color of their skin rather than giving IQ tests to white supremacists?”.

Innate ones that don’t require any further context like “If white people aren’t at the top of that list anyway, why is the ‘okay to abuse’ cut off at second place?”

Ultimately, they’re no different from the religious extremists. They’re bigots and they’ve worked backwards from that to find an excuse.

source