Comment on What's the closest any animal species has come to evolving to have telepathy?

tobogganablaze@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• dev_null@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  If a species used radio communication, I don’t think I’d be against people calling it telepathy.

  source

  • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    But it would be rather inconsistent. It’s just another part of the electromagnetic spectrum and we wouldn’t call visual communication telepathy.

    source

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Why inconsistent? It’s a transfer of information without physical interaction and without using any human senses.

      source

      • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Flowers can communicate with bees via ultraviolet light, which is not a human sense. So by your definition flowers can telepathically communicate with bees. For that would sounds like a very odd thing to say.

        Also the exchange of electromagnetic radiation IS a physical interaction.

        if you define it as not using any senses it doesn’t, but that would be a useless definition, because nothing could possibly satisfy it.

        But that’s very much my point. Telepathy, as defined in the dictonary, does not exist and so nothing should satisfy the definition.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • acockworkorange@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Pigeons have an organ in the brain that allows them to sense the earth’s magnetic field.

    source

    • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Fish too, but I believe its part of their outer skin not brain

      source
    • dev_null@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      And if they could use it to exchange thoughts and ideas with others, I’d call that telepathy, but they don’t/

      source