I did address it, like you advocating for indiscriminate homocide but not discriminate homocide, only indiscriminate homocide you support.
I did address it, like you advocating for indiscriminate homocide but not discriminate homocide, only indiscriminate homocide you support.
Railcar8095@lemm.ee 6 months ago
It seems English is not your first or last language, given your comprehension and way of “speaking”.
I didn’t advocate for any of this. Those are examples of things that can be crimes in many places, and do not have ill intent or hate.
uzi@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
You’re not recognizing the implications of your own words and what the terms you use openly advocate for.
Railcar8095@lemm.ee 6 months ago
I’m not advocating (except for feeding pigeons). I’m telling things that are crimes in some locations. I really think you have reading comprehension issues.
Don’t worry, I understand. Nobody likes being prevent wrong. You’ll survive, I’m sure.
uzi@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
No, it’s the implications of individual terms that you have already posted. You say it is an individual right commit geneocide and mass murder. Look at your own terms that you said. It doesn’t matter the intent behind your words if that’s not what you meant. You used the terms, therefore you want the free exercise of genocide of humans and mass murder as fit.