It’s the same as “only 2% of people get this right! If you get it right you have a very strong brain!”. It’s just a little more devious about it.
Comment on a very emphatic answer
bisby@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I hate how these things always come up because “order of operations!” It’s mostly people who are bad at math remembering one topic they struggled with and finally got right, and now they know it’s a touchy subject so it will drive engagement. It’s the modern equivalent of “Mathematicians hate this one secret for solving equations! Click to find out!” Pure engagement bait.
But in all the engineering ive done, things never really come up like this. If there is any potential clarity issues, parentheses would be used, or it would be formatted in a way that makes it much more clear.
40 - (32/2), or 40 - ³²⁄₂ has no clarity issues imo. You don’t even have to think about order of operations because 32 halves is a number on its own. it isn’t an “operation” to do necessarily, it’s a fraction to reduce.
And yes, I get the joke. The joke is making fun of the engagement bait of “some people will get the order of operations wrong!”
The joke
(40 - 32)/2 = 4 but the kid said “4!” not “4” 40 - (32/2) = 24 = 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 4!
Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 months ago
gregorum@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Exactly. I’ve only 2% of people get it, perhaps you’re just shitty at communicating.
Ballistic_86@lemmy.world 5 months ago
It does leave ambiguity with it being an, apparent, quote/dialogue. Correct and Incorrect are both correct depending on your POV and how you interpret social media posts
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Love the insight on the bait.
Thanks for the mathsplanation too.
jackvito@discuss.online 5 months ago
Venturing into the trading world without the help of a professional trader and expecting profit is like turning water into wine you would need a miracle, that’s why trade with Mrs Eloise Wilbert , her skills are exceptional. You can reach out to her on INSTAGRAM 👉 EXPERT ELOISE WILBERT
jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 months ago
It reminds me of a very old xkcd that posits "communicating badly and acting smug when you’re misunderstood is not cleverness "
xkcd.com/169/
rockerface@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I knew XKCD is based, but this is new level
Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I mean, xkcd numbers its comics sequentially, and he’s well into the 2000’s now, so a 1xy comic is ancient. Looks like at times, old xkcd was brutal.
5765313496@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Especially hat guy.
SmartmanApps@programming.dev 5 months ago
Who’s on first? :-)