Comment on Update about lemm.ee infrastructure & upcoming cakeday
sunaurus@lemm.ee 5 weeks agoWe’ve been stable just around 200€ per month for most of this year (it fluctuates up and down a little bit depending on exact usage). I update status.lemm.ee once every month with expected running costs for that month, and while it hasn’t changed much in the past months, if it does ever change, you’ll find up to date info there!
Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Good to see that you have a decent reserve! How many users does lemm.ee have? Just because I’m curious about the cost per user per month
sunaurus@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
We have about 3.3k monthly active users. This is based on users who at least vote/comment/post once a month, so it doesn’t include lurkers. But yeah, in terms of just infrastructure costs, we’re at about 6 cents per active user per month.
Kallioapina@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
How can I donate to lemm.ee to help ease the financial burden a even a little bit?
Blaze@reddthat.com 5 weeks ago
Links are in the sidebar:
Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
I’m no expert but that sounds incredibly efficient. I could pay for myself and a number of lurkers here for 10 years on £6… It makes me wonder where all that ad revenue goes on commercial social media.
sunaurus@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Well, one advantage we have over commercial social media is that they need to pay people to write code and maintain the infrastructure, but a lot of work on Lemmy is volunteer-based.
Many admins for bigger instances are basically on-call the whole year for free, open source contributors provide code for free, etc. Even the core maintainers are effectively losing money by working on Lemmy, because while they are getting some income, the sum of money they are getting from working on Lemmy is way smaller than what they would get if they worked typical software engineering jobs.
Basically, if any non-volunteer organization wanted to replicate Lemmy, it would cost them quite a bit more in terms of payroll alone.
Another aspect is scale - Lemmy is able to spread the costs between different instances, and while growth of the network can generally increase costs for individual nodes, they will still end up paying less compared to if they were hosting the entire social network in a centralized way.