Comment on higher wages for the servers... by the customers. Fnbs
Cybermass@lemmy.world 10 months agoThe sun’s core being filled with a quark plasma soup instead of, for example cotton candy, is also an assumption that is not evidence-based.
It’s almost like we as humans can use logic and reason to determine things to be extremely significantly probable without having proof in our hands.
SCB@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The sun’s composition is absolutely evidence-based.
www.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/www_solar/PUS/…/howstudy.html#….
You’re making the assumption that 1: this money is embezzled by the owner
2: people are less likely to tip
You’re also making a third: that servers receiving less pay won’t go elsewhere
Whereas we extrapolate from data to understand the Sun (moving from evidence to conclusion) you are starting with your expected result and then manufacturing caused (embezzlement, lack of tips)
This is the opposite of using “logic and reason”
CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 10 months ago
I believe you made the argument stating that this is going to reduce server’s wages and if these fees aren’t going to employees and its not the business owner keeping them, then where could that money possibly be going?
SCB@lemmy.world 10 months ago
No I said people wanting to move servers to a set hourly wage would reduce their wages.
CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 10 months ago
But where’s the logic and reason in this opinion? The other guy is “making assumptions” by saying this will improve conditions when they don’t have to beg for tips, and here you’re saying their wages will go down without any facts or evidence immediately after your snarky analogy about the sun’s position. Ridiculous.