Comment on higher wages for the servers... by the customers. Fnbs
SCB@lemmy.world 1 year agoThis conclusions requires two separate assumptions from you that are not evidence-based
Comment on higher wages for the servers... by the customers. Fnbs
SCB@lemmy.world 1 year agoThis conclusions requires two separate assumptions from you that are not evidence-based
Cybermass@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The sun’s core being filled with a quark plasma soup instead of, for example cotton candy, is also an assumption that is not evidence-based.
It’s almost like we as humans can use logic and reason to determine things to be extremely significantly probable without having proof in our hands.
SCB@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The sun’s composition is absolutely evidence-based.
www.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/www_solar/PUS/…/howstudy.html#….
You’re making the assumption that 1: this money is embezzled by the owner
2: people are less likely to tip
You’re also making a third: that servers receiving less pay won’t go elsewhere
Whereas we extrapolate from data to understand the Sun (moving from evidence to conclusion) you are starting with your expected result and then manufacturing caused (embezzlement, lack of tips)
This is the opposite of using “logic and reason”
CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 1 year ago
I believe you made the argument stating that this is going to reduce server’s wages and if these fees aren’t going to employees and its not the business owner keeping them, then where could that money possibly be going?
SCB@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No I said people wanting to move servers to a set hourly wage would reduce their wages.