Comment

Here is a better idea: have some academic integrity and actually do the work instead of using incompetent machine learning to flood the industry with inaccurate trash papers whose only real impact is getting in the way of real research.

source

Sort:hotnew top

yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
There is nothing wrong with using AI to proofread a paper. It’s just a grammar checker but better.

source
- FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  You can literally use tools to check grammar perfectly without using AI. What the LLM AI does is it predict what word comes next in a sequence, and if the AI is wrong as it often is then you’ve just attempted to publish a paper with halucinations wasting the time and effort of so many people because you’re greedy and lazy.
  
  source
  - yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    AI does better at checking for grammar and clarity of message. It’s just a fact. I’ve made comparisons myself using a grammar checker on an essay vs AI and AI corrected it and made it much better.
    
    source
    FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    AI doesn’t do anything better than a human being. Human Beings are the training data, an AI that mimics it 98% is still less accurate than the humans. If you suck so much at writing papers then you’re just below average as a human being who writes papers and using tools will never remedy that without introspection and a desire to improve.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- BearGun@ttrpg.network ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Proofreading involves more than just checking grammar mate
  
  source
  - yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    I entirely agree. You should read through something you’ll publish.
    
    source