Comment on Name & same. :)
RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 5 weeks agoIt’s because nobody was there to highlight the text for them.
Comment on Name & same. :)
RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 5 weeks agoIt’s because nobody was there to highlight the text for them.
exscape@kbin.social 5 weeks ago
The entire abstract is AI. Even without the explicit mention in one sentence, the rest of the text should've been rejected as nonspecific nonsense.
canihasaccount@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
That’s not actually the abstract; it’s a piece from the discussion that someone pasted nicely with the first page in order to name and shame the authors. I looked at it in depth when I saw this circulate a little while ago.
exscape@kbin.social 5 weeks ago
Ah, that makes more sense. I looked up the original abstract and indeed it looks more like what you'd expect (hard to comprehend for someone that's not in the field).
Though to clarify (for others reading this) they still did use generative AI to (help?) write the paper, which is only part of why it was withdrawn.
RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Maybe a big red circle around the entire abstract would have helped