Where is it wrong?
I still take points of for assuming its a puzzle but it does at the end it does mention they can just cross if there are no other items to complicate the scenario.
Comment on Solve a puzzle for me
Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 months agoWell, it’s certainly more elaborately wrong.
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 6 months ago
shasta@lemm.ee 6 months ago
It’s still wrong because between 4 and 5 it doesn’t say it leaves the goat on the original side. That’s only implied because of the constraints.
Danksy@lemmy.world 6 months ago
How is it wrong? First it makes some assumptions about the question and answers the typical version of the riddle. Then it answers the trivial version where there are no additional items. Seems like a complete and reasonable response to me.
ICastFist@programming.dev 6 months ago
GPT should’ve started with “if it’s only about a goat and a boat” instead of going through the whole goat wolf cabbage puzzle first. Now that would make it look smarter
Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 months ago
Ah, I hadn’t read that anymore. I thought, it assumed that it was about the cabbage+wolf riddle and that would be the rest of its blathering. @webghost101@sopuli.xyz
webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 6 months ago
Human error?
Image