Comment on Solve a puzzle for me

• Danksy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  How is it wrong? First it makes some assumptions about the question and answers the typical version of the riddle. Then it answers the trivial version where there are no additional items. Seems like a complete and reasonable response to me.

  source

  • ICastFist@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    GPT should’ve started with “if it’s only about a goat and a boat” instead of going through the whole goat wolf cabbage puzzle first. Now that would make it look smarter

    source
  • Ephera@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Ah, I hadn’t read that anymore. I thought, it assumed that it was about the cabbage+wolf riddle and that would be the rest of its blathering. @webghost101@sopuli.xyz

    source

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Human error?

      Image

      source
• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Where is it wrong?

  I still take points of for assuming its a puzzle but it does at the end it does mention they can just cross if there are no other items to complicate the scenario.

  source

  • shasta@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    It’s still wrong because between 4 and 5 it doesn’t say it leaves the goat on the original side. That’s only implied because of the constraints.

    source