Comment on Cum
nahuse@sh.itjust.works 5 months agoIn this case, then, it would be pro hoc, since the crankiness comes after the not eating.
Comment on Cum
nahuse@sh.itjust.works 5 months agoIn this case, then, it would be pro hoc, since the crankiness comes after the not eating.
CTDummy@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
nahuse@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Yeah, that’s what I mean.
The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.