Comment on US foreign aid package: how is it financed?
xmunk@sh.itjust.works 7 months agoWill that make up for the cost? Probably not […]
I think you’re being a bit too conservative here, especially with your finishing point about direct US involvement there is a compelling argument that 60B today would quite a steal if it avoided the cost of waging a direct war against Russia in military expenses alone. If we start considering lost productivity due to a draft and especially economic damage on US soil and especially especially the damage if nukes were involved… then it’s hugely profitable. All that, of course, depends on the likelihood of direct conflict.
In addition, Ukraine is a valuable economic partner and investing in their future stability might also be a fair justification.
The TL;DR is that I don’t really disagree with anything you said but I think you’re under valuing how good of an RoI this grant is.
BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 7 months ago
You could be right, it really depends on what you assume it’s buying. I was more referring to the direct economic stimulation paying itself off.
Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I mean, 60B isn’t an outrageous amount for just the grain. 5% of the world’s grain comes from Ukraine, and Russia already has a rich history of using their resource exports to extort Western governments.