Comment

Comment on Nimbys v Yimbys: the affluent inner Melbourne suburbs that aren’t pulling their weight on housing

Nath@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

I also suspect you need to aggregate smaller lots in order to include more liveable components like large central garden areas/atriums and larger surface areas for light and air flow.

Having moved my family into higher-density housing last year, it has its drawbacks. The kids no longer have a yard. I couldn’t even set up the trampoline at the new place ( it only needs about 3m^2^) as there not a single blade of grass on the property. The nearest park is 600m away. This sounds super close, but it is far enough that the kids are not in earshot if there are any issues. Outdoor space is by far the biggest drawback to the new area. My wife also really misses having a garden to potter in.

It’s not enough to just build high-density housing if you want families to live there. We need a lot more parks and recreational spaces factored into the infrastructure calculations. But those things are not profitable.

source

Sort:hotnew top

maegul@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

But those things are not profitable.

Yep! Which is why the government getting pushy is probably absolutely necessary. This is a reforming the city situation, not just nudging things in a better direction. I fear Melbourne is on track to turn some areas into waste dumps that no one wants to live in. You can almost see it: well built train stations on the “sky rail” that trains often skip because no one really lives there. This sort of thing can happen! Checkout the the Imhe Zentrum in Hanover Germany (duckduckgo.com/?q=hannover+ihme+zentrum&t=ftsa&ia…) … a combined shopping center and apartment complex that’s now basically abandoned post-apocalypse style.

source
vividspecter@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

It’s not enough to just build high-density housing if you want families to live there. We need a lot more parks and recreational spaces factored into the infrastructure calculations.

Can’t argue with that. I’ll add that high density housing can mean a lot of different things, from duplexes/fourplexes and rowhouses to small apartment buildings to giant high rises. Some of these forms can easily accommodate a backyard or front yard (or both). Getting rid of parking minimums (or better yet, legislating parking maximums) would mean more land can be dedicated to green space.

source
sphere_au@reddthat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Rooftop gardens and semi open high floor shared areas are possible… Not necessarily a huge amount of space, but I’ve seen it work. Just need the apartment building to be built with a decent budget.

source