Comment on Is there a more politically and ideologically diverse alternative for Lemmy?

• Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I don’t entirely disagree

  source

  • msage@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Right now I don’t see how our current society can survive. We are doing nothing at all to stop burning fossil fuels (renewables go up, but so does fossil burning), the richest find more and more absurd ways to waste energy (bitcoin, LLMs), everywhere more and more people go poor even in developed nations (prices skyrocketing, mainly food and rent), and we are just starting to see that climate is starting to change, and not to our optimistic scenarios.

    I don’t think we are going to make it.

    source

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I don’t see climate change as an existential threat to the human race in a way something like nuclear war, a pandemic, asteroid or AI could be. It’s bad but it’s not that bad. I never really understood why so many seem to think this way when I don’t even hear scientists making such apocalyptic claims.

      source

      • Dasus@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I don’t see the actual climate change as an existential threat to the human race in a way something like nuclear war, a pandemic, asteroid or AI could be. It’s bad but it’s not that bad.

        “My ignorance is worth more than your knowledge.”

        washingtonpost.com/…/climate-change-ipcc-report-1…

        Beyond that threshold, scientists have found, climate disasters will become so extreme that people will not be able to adapt. Basic components of the Earth system will be fundamentally, irrevocably altered.

        The report reveals thresholds in how much warming people and ecosystems can adapt to. Some are “soft” limits — determined by shortcomings in political and social systems. For example, a low-income community that can’t afford to build flood controls faces soft limits to dealing with sea level rise.

        But beyond 1.5 degrees of warming, the IPCC says, humanity will run up against “hard limits” to adaptation. Temperatures will get too high to grow many staple crops. Droughts will become so severe that even the strongest water conservation measures can’t compensate. In a world that has warmed roughly 3 degrees Celsius (5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) — where humanity appears to be headed — the harsh physical realities of climate change will be deadly for countless plants, animals and people

        “I’ve never understood why…”

        And I can bet you never tried to understand.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • msage@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Maybe I understood the situation too bleakly, but my impression was, that we are losing topsoil (used to grow almost all our food), biodiversity is plummeting (which can trigger chain reaction of massive die-offs), the ice is melting (blue ocean event, likely irreversible) causing billions of people to lose their homes, and depleting aquifies (drinking water). Hotter climate will cause runaway effects, that will multiply all of this, which could lead to decimating most of life in the oceans (food for majority of people), meaning more hungry people inland, politically already unstable, now without soil, water, and getting severe droughts and much more acidic rain. There are possibilities of new diseases appearing from the thawing permafrost, as well as newly mutated ones.

        Everything will be made worse by the current trends in politics, but I suspect those politics are trending because some people are aware where are we heading.

        source

        • -> View More Comments