Comment on [deleted]
scarabic@lemmy.world 10 months agoIt’s a question of which side will see more voters activated by the issue, and go on to vote: remember that winning is largely about generating the momentum for people who already support you to vote at all, not just swaying hearts and minds to vote for you. It’s barely that latter at all.
So they calculate they can get more church ladies and reactionary males to get fired up about protecting babies and punishing jezebels than the democrats can get people fired up about protecting women’s healthcare. Given how shafted women are across the board, betting on hate may be a winning move.
Rolder@reddthat.com 10 months ago
But every time abortion is on the ballot, the republicans lose. So clearly betting on hate isn’t working.
Ah well, far be it from me to stop them from shooting themselves in the foot.
scarabic@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Republicans have no good strategies left, only bad ones to choose between. They have a base that thinks ending immigration would be a good thing, when it’s immigration that keeps our economy afloat. What do you even do with that?
They’ve gotten a great deal of mileage out of the abortion issue over the last 30 years. And now they’ve finally struck down Roe, delivering a long-promised victory to their base and seemingly legitimizing their long drive for this. Perhaps that emboldens them to overplay their hand?
tburkhol@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Not in their primaries.
With so many states ridiculously gerrymandered, Republican candidates - in non-state-wide races - really only need to beat other republicans. If the Evangelical/anti-abortion block can reliably deliver around 1/3 of voters, they will reliably swing a primary. That keeps the party captured by their radicals, and keeps the country stuck with the ideology of a minority of the minority.