I don’t think it’s constructive to attack me because I don’t agree. I have written scathing blog posts about Mozilla. If the CEO reached out to me, I would feel a sense of responsibility to let them have their same. I’m not saying over the phone, I’m all for paper trails. But the way that Lori put themselves across, it didn’t resonate with me in a positive way.
Comment on Why I Lost Faith in Kagi
Nia_The_Cat@beehaw.org 1 year ago[deleted]
sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 year ago
snooggums@midwest.social 1 year ago
Someone disagreeing with you is not the same as attacking you.
sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 year ago
Suggesting I’m victim blaming is an ad-hominem attack 🙃
snooggums@midwest.social 1 year ago
You wrote:
The fact that a CEO took time out to try and engage and discuss this users fears and concerns should be applauded.
The context of the post was that the CEO contacted them and then kept contacting them after being told to stop. You are cheering on a CEO repeatedly contacting someone to tell them why their opinion was wrong. You are criticizing the person who was harassed by saying the person who harassed them should be applauded.
You were victim blaming, and they even pointed it out kindly.
xyguy@startrek.website 1 year ago
That was my main take-away. You’re the CEO of the company. If someone writes a mean blog post about your business so what? Fix the issues with the product if they are legitimate things that need fixing. Otherwise leave people alone. If something constitutes libel then sue. Otherwise it’s just someones opinion which they are entitled to.
No I have a bad opinion about him as well (please don’t reach out to me either).
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 year ago
First big lesson as a CEO. If they would have ignored this it would have made the rounds but faded into irrelevance. After all it is just a blog, on the fediverse. By engaging though it became very clickable, and now it’s going to hurt way worse than the original blog.