Comment on this one goes out to the arts & humanities
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 9 months agoI sincerely doubt AI voice over will out perform human actors in the next 100 years in any metric, including cost or time savings.
Comment on this one goes out to the arts & humanities
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 9 months agoI sincerely doubt AI voice over will out perform human actors in the next 100 years in any metric, including cost or time savings.
EnderMB@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Not sure why you’re downvoted, but this is already happening. There was a story a few days ago of a long-time BBC voice-over artist that lost their gig. There have also been several stories of VA workers being handed contracts that allow the reuse of their voice for AI purposes.
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
The artist you’re referring to is Sara Poyzer - m.imdb.com/name/nm1528342/ - she was replaced in one specific way:
The BBC is making a documentary about someone (as yet unknown), who is dying and has lost the ability to speak. Poyzer was on pencil (like standby, hold the date - but not confirmed).to narrate the dying person’s words. Instead they contracted an AI agency to use AI to mimic the dying persons voice (from when they could still speak).
It would likely be cheaper and easier to hire an impressionist, or Ms Poyzer herself but I assume they are doing it for the “novelty” value, and with the blessing of the terminally ill person.
For that reason I think my point still stands, they have made the work harder and more expensive, and created a negative PR storm - all problems created by AI and not solved by.
You are incorrect that AI voice contracts are common place, as SAG negotiated that use of AI voice tools is to be compensated as if the actor recorded the lines themselves - which most actors do from home nowadays, so again it’s at best the same cost for an inferior product.