Yeah I got that impression from the other comments. I might go back to just that part for the hell of it. Seems to be kind of a meme.
Comment on What more need be said about it?
Thisisforfun@lemmy.world 10 months agoJust wait till you get to the last third, where the ideas that weren’t subtly telegraphed in the first two thirds will be even less subtly shouted in a hundred page long speach.
solidstate@feddit.de 10 months ago
batmaniam@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m the guy from above who said I liked the “quantity over quality” she had because it let me get lost. Even I skipped “the speech” lmfao. It just repeats the shitty, not subtle, ideas that have been repeated 100x by that point, and even within itself it repeats the same damn thing over and over and over.
I can see it being a nifty writing technique to basically have an academic paper micro-version of the whole work diogenically within your philosophy tilted book, but the problem is if that was the intent, it’s a paper that no one would publish because it sucks.
postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I got to that part, and it was at that point i shruged.
revlayle@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Slow down there, Atlas