Comment on Does The New York Times Actually Care About Mass Shootings?
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 months agoIt’s all about controlling people. They focus on my guns which are kept responsibly and legally
Their plans violate th constitution. I know you guys think it’s toilet paper but to us it’s how we run the country.
If liberals were serious they’d support more law enforcement, longer sentences and other things proven to work. Joe proved that with his crime bill.
Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
I hope anyone reading this understands that having a different interpretation of the constitution and having different ideas about how to reduce senseless deaths -even if possibly mistaken or misguided- this doesn’t mean it’s about controlling people and doesn’t mean they think the constitution is toilet paper. That’s just extremist language intended to deligitimize someones difference of opinion.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 months ago
When the liberals want to ban weapons protected by the 2nd amendment from lawful citizens, it’s about control.
Since most the murders happen in democrat cities. How about they don’t try to tell us how to lower murder rates ? Maybe if they didn’t defund the police and honor criminals, that might me a good start.
It’s weird liberals think they have a solution when their examples have shown otherwise.
BunkerBuster@lemmy.world 5 months ago
This idea that democrat cities are where the murders happen has been wrong for 2 decades: www.thirdway.org/…/the-red-state-murder-problem
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I like how they to gloss over the deaths in the red states are mainly in the democrat cities. lol.