ideally such changes to advertising and the ToS arbitration clause removing consumer rights will help give a lot of the open-source communities a gentle push to get off of discord. It’s become far too central to too many communities and is impossible to search for knowledge.
Comment on Enshittification Continues: Discord to begin showing advertisements on it's free platform
Zworf@beehaw.org 5 months ago
Good. I hope people will move away from it soon. I hate Discord for banning third-party clients and datamining my system for installed apps. So I’ve never really used it.
It does mean I’m excluded from some FOSS projects’ support like Home Assistant but to hell with that :P
empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 months ago
ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 5 months ago
I’ve only ever used it in browser to limit what it can see on my machine. I was told by one of my coding professors once that one of the signs of a virus is if it monitors what apps you’re running, I’ve been cautious ever since of anything that does that (obviously it isn’t the only sign and isn’t instant virus bin, like I have an app that monitors GPU usage and throttles apps to keep from cooking my machine)
Diotima@ttrpg.network 5 months ago
Don’t forget that it saves even your deleted DMs for as long as you have an account!
dan@upvote.au 5 months ago
People will move away, sure, but to another proprietary service that’ll do the same thing in a year or two.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 5 months ago
You mean like they moved away from Reddit when they killed 3rd party clients and openly began selling user data to data brokers?
Or how they left Twitter when it was bought by an egomaniac who killed 3rd party clients, fired the entirety of the moderation staff, then required users to log in to view posts?
Or maybe how they left Facebook after any of the many times they’ve been caught collecting user data against their will, promoted genocide, never allowed 3rd party apps, and willingly manipulated elections?
Nevermind the fact that those platforms have had ads for decades.
Yeah sorry, ain’t gonna happen.
Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
Hey I am here
dan@upvote.au 5 months ago
Facebook used to allow third party apps (e.g. Snaptu started as a third-party app before the acquisition) and exposed most of the functionality via their API, but it’s not really a thing any more after Cambridge Analytica - the API was locked down significantly. You can’t really have it both ways… Allowing third-party apps also allows those apps to scrape and store user info, which is what Cambridge Analytica did.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 5 months ago
I don’t want it both ways.
Accessing an API is not scraping. Scraping is still possible without an API. All CA did was access public information. The problem in that case is not access to public information, it is intentional paid disinformation.
dan@upvote.au 5 months ago
I probably used the wrong words… What I meant is that given API access, a malicious third-party can gather a large amount of data and store it in a way that goes against the service’s terms of service, without the proper privacy guarantees (e.g. user data being deleted if they delete their account). Obviously that’s a problem for a social network where people can post a lot of friends-only posts.