Comment on A Parallel World?
goldenballs@wolfballs.com 2 years agoNo its not. Its "scientifically proven" that there are not three "races". It's utter bollocks. I amas right wing ad they come, but i am a real scientist and a real engineer, with plebty of familiarity with logic, in every sense.
Those that disagree are not on the left. I would say that those who think there are "three races" are far more left wing and effeminate than me
You have to deal with reality, which is expressed in genetic data as y-chromosome and mtDNA haplogroups. Talking about "race" is 18th century bollocks, like phrenology.
Gender is just another word for sex: holes and poles. It's all chromosomes. All "trans" rhetoric is bollocks. Hermaphrodites are rare genetic anomalies.
There are no "social constructs"; or "social vobstructs" are "social constructs". Eurasian ethnic groups have some Neanderthal DNA, and Africans don't. Australasians and Negritos don't much either, just a bit of Denisovan. It's not complicated really. "White-skinned peope", are a spectrum from the Indus to the Levant to the Alps and Carpathians, to the coastal fringes of Europe. Are Turks and Armenians ""white"? Well most Turks have Hittite and Greek or Celtic, Caucasian or Armenian DNA. Many Jews are Slavic Khazars with no Semitic DNA. Arabs? Persians? I guess they are outside the range.
Spotted_Lady@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
With all due respect, I believe you misunderstood everything I said. And yes, it is scientifically proven that there are 3 groupings that we call races. Period. That is my final answer and what I will believe forever.
Blacks, Asians, and Caucasians are different in kind, just like male and female are different in kind (well, different parts of the same kind). I identify as Caucasian and put my own white race first like everyone should do with their own race. There can be no racism if every group puts their own people first which I see as a moral responsibility, and learns to prefer their own kind, keep their own customs to their own people, and not interfere with the rights or business of other people.
My part in this subpart of the thread is over. Thank you.
goldenballs@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
"that is my final answer and what I will believe forever" is not a scientific statement, it's an emotional, religious one, which is the kind of thing that leftist-statists say.
Caucaisians are people from the Caucasus, and technically, Arabs, northern Indians, Persian peoples like Tajiks and Kurds, as well as Anatolians are "caucasoid" if you want to use that archaic unscientific term... But i doubt you would consider them "white"... "White"/"caucasian" are american concepts and terms that are political pre-scientific constructs.
"Racial reality" is defined in genes, in configurations of haplogroups... When you look at them you see a scientific expression of what your lying eyes tell you... That (e.g.:) Abdul and Solomon, are not "white" because they have haplogroup J, and no haplogroup I or R in their gene matrix.
The word "race" is meaningless, as is the word "white". Many north americans have all the haplogroups of various categories of European, and it makes more sense to identify as a "Euro-American". That's what you are. That's your blood, your soil, and much of your culture.
Spotted_Lady@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
I said my part in this thread is over. I didn't read the above, and won't.
So let's agree to disagree. I am NOT here to debate and refuse to allow others to attempt to force me to.
Regards.
goldenballs@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
Well shut up then :D nobody is "forcing" you to do anything, soyboy; but science doesn't change just because you refuse to understand it.
Scruffy_Nerfherder@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
IQ tests prove you wrong.
goldenballs@wolfballs.com 2 years ago
You could even pass one.