Comment

Corgana@startrek.website ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

But how would us blocking ourselves from following Threads accounts on Mastodon stop them from… anything? That’s the part I don’t get. It feels a bit like cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face, yeah?

source

Sort:hotnew top

millie@beehaw.org ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
It’s two-way. It prevents interactivity between the instances, meaning that Mastodon doesn’t get flooded with Threads users and Threads doesn’t get access to Mastodon content.

Preventing both of those things is a win for the fediverse, because it preserves its identity and purpose rather than just being 10% of a network controlled mostly by Meta.

Allowing both of these things to happen is a win for Meta, because their users overwhelm the fediverse and they get free content until it no longer exists.

source
- WamGams@lemmy.ca ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I am thinking along the same lines as you. The fediverse needs to remain free of commercial interests and influences.
  
  We all came here because we were looking for community driven social media, while metavitself has largely killed the modern world’s sense of community.
  
  source