Haha, haven’t heart about that. Sounds ridiculous!
Interrupting motorsports may give then more sympathy.
Like when they glued themselves on a race track of Formula E electric racing because promoting emission free propulsion is apparently bad as well.
Michal@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Not only is it ridiculous to protest the promotion of emission-free propulsion, it’s also accepting that their own people could be killed and bystanders traumatized for life.
But hey, those three or so people got their 30 seconds in the spotlight: www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgekxYhO26s
steakmeout@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Cool. Now tell us all that Greta predicted the end of the world and yet we’re all still here.
woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I don’t care about that nuclear power apologist.
CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 1 year ago
Emission free, eh? How was the electricity generated?
Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It really depends on the energy generation mix on the country were they’re racing.
Electricity generation is however emitting less and less (as renewables become an ever larger fraction of it) which makes electric cars directly have less emissions all the while requiring no vehicle changes whatsoever, something not all possible with non-electric means of motorised transportation since the “generate the energy” directly in the vehicle so you need to upgrade the vehicle to improve the energy generation.
So yeah, that stuff is promoting emission free propulsion (already so today in some countries, certainly tomorrow in all), something which cannot be said of the other options.
It’s pretty stupid to go after the “not yet perfectly ecological” alternative when there are a ton of “outright anti-Ecological and will never be any better” ones to go after.