How is it âmaliciousâ?
Comment on đ Meta just showed off Threadsâ fediverse integration for the very first timeđ
helenslunch@feddit.nl â¨7⊠â¨months⊠agoSeems unlikely. This is Metaâs malicious compliance with MDA or whatever from the EU.
jarfil@beehaw.org â¨7⊠â¨months⊠ago
helenslunch@feddit.nl â¨7⊠â¨months⊠ago
We donât know yet the full answer to that but Iâd say being âopt inâ without any sort of prompt ( especially when every other fucking Meta feature is âopt outâ ), or having unidirectional federation would qualify as malicious.
thingsiplay@beehaw.org â¨7⊠â¨months⊠ago
At what exactly do you refer to? Meta does not need to federate with the Fediverse. I am not aware of any law that would force Meta doing this.
Lionir@beehaw.org â¨7⊠â¨months⊠ago
The DMA has clauses that force big companies that are considered âgatekeepersâ to allow interoperability with other services.
thingsiplay@beehaw.org â¨7⊠â¨months⊠ago
Good to know! I guess thatâs why Apple is forced to communicate with Android.
helenslunch@feddit.nl â¨7⊠â¨months⊠ago
Yes, also why Apple is going to allow sideloading (even though they also are complying maliciously) and also MS now allows you to uninstall Edge.
All of this, of course, only applies in the EU.