People like you are why Mt. Everest had two feet added to its actual size so as to not seem too perfect.
Comment on Huh
EarMaster@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I am wondering why it adds up to exactly 100%. There has to be some creative data handling happened with these numbers.
Gabu@lemmy.world 8 months ago
EarMaster@lemmy.world 8 months ago
No I’m not. Why would I use feet to measure a mountain’s height?
Gabu@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Peak XV (measured in feet) was calculated to be exactly 29,000 ft (8,839.2 m) high, but was publicly declared to be 29,002 ft (8,839.8 m) in order to avoid the impression that an exact height of 29,000 feet (8,839.2 m) was nothing more than a rounded estimate.
MeatPilot@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Maybe the article was generated using another LLM?