Comment on Every game developer company should be like this

• Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  As opposed to an f2p game with DLC? Or buying a full game and, once you played the first part of it, you decided you liked it, then you paid and the rest of the game you already had was unlocked.

  I LOVE ARPGs but I am well aware that the Blizzard/Diablo model is almost exactly what people rage against. Diablo 2, Diablo 3, Dungeon Siege 1, Dungeon Siege 2, and plenty of others all followed the model of releasing the first 3-4 acts and then releasing the 4th/5th act for 30 bucks a year later.

  source

  • CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You’re being purposely confusing and intellectually dishonest, to try to control the narrative.

    www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shareware

    source

    • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Then please, stop me from being “intellectually dishonest”

      What is the distinction between a Free to play game with paid expansion packs and DLC and a copy of a game that came on a CD that tells me where I can send a money order to to buy extra content?

      Oh, am I being “intellectually dishonest” because I am not respecting the branding? Is that the distinction?

      source

      • Lizardking27@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        “buying a full game and, once you played the first part of it, you decided you liked it, then you paid and the rest of the game you already had was unlocked.”

        “Free to play game with paid expansion packs and DLC”

        Right there. There’s the blatant dishonesty. You’ve just described two different scenarios while attempting to portray them as the same.

        You’re welcome. Now go away.

        source