Comment on This shouldn’t be normalised

• NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m legitimately interested in getting the bank account & sort code details of Elon, Bezos, Arnault, Zuckerberg, Gates, Ballmer, Buffet, Ellison, Page, and Brin.

  source
• avonarret1@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That ist something I ask myself, too. It’s so irritating, having to decline all these greasy fingered little fuckers one-by-one. That is just a way for me, nowadays, to delete the app completely.

  source
• GrievingWidow420@feddit.it ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Just curious what you’re up to, bud

  source

  • Holzkohlen@feddit.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Something utterly deranged, which is why I care about my privacy. I swear to god if Mozilla starts indexing my mail to train their crappy AI project, I will lose it.

    source
• SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  “Legitimate interest” refers to that which lawmakers have considered to be the “legitimate interest” of private companies, that is, making money selling your data. “Illegitimate interest” would probably be using your private information to blackmail you.

  source

  • CeeBee@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I understand the legal meaning. It’s all hogwash regardless. Nearly everything can be explained away as legitimate interests by claiming “marketing research” and “advertising”.

    source
• jballs@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  $$$

  source
• MisterFrog@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I think this is so they can have it auto toggled on per some EU regulations, forcing you to go through and untoggle every single one with “legitimate interest”.

  It’s what I assume, anyway

  source
• Buddahriffic@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I was also curious about this and just had a chat with gpt 3.5 about it, and it gave an example of “a bank collecting data to detect and prevent fraud” as a valid legitimate interest and “a company collecting data to sell to advertisers” as an invalid legitimate interest.

  It also said that legitimate interests must be explained, as on what interests they are, why they are considered legitimate, how the processing of that data accomplishes that interest and any potential impact it has on the user’s privacy and freedom.

  Based on this, I think “legitimate interest” is being used as a reason instead of a category that covers genetic legitimate reasons that should still be explained, not hand waved as “legitimate interest”.

  Though I believe this only applies in the context of the GPDR (because the bot specifically mentioned it), and might vary in other jurisdictions.

  source