Didn’t Jordan Peterson get in trouble for some of his comments ? They wanted to take away his license.
Comment on JK Rowling reported to police for ‘misgendering’ trans TV newsreader
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 6 months agoAbsolutely! Unless your opinion is visible minorities should die. In which case, you can’t publish it. You can still say it in private or in non-public forums.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 6 months ago
Blamemeta@lemm.ee 6 months ago
So two things.
That’s not free speech then. If you want to run your country that way, fine, but don’t call it free speech.
Even horrible speech should be protected. An old quote: “I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” and it’s one I like. If someone wants to out themselves as a bigot, I say let them.
Misgendering someone is not saying anyone should die, visible minorities or not.
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
As an aside, It’s just like how Americans say they’re the most free when they have the highest prison population. Canadians can smoke cannabis but Americans go to jail for it. Canadians can get an abortion but Americans go to jail for it. Canadians can buy pseudoephedrine but Americans can’t. When a Canadian leaves the country they dont need to pay Canadian taxes, but Americans still do even when abroad. I really don’t get what Americans think freedom is. It really just feels like no limits on guns and bigotry is all one needs to be free. Nothing else matters.
I agree. Canada has hate speech laws, not horrible speech laws. They’re incredibly specific and the average person would have a hard time getting in trouble with them. The only cases seem to be with prominent neo-nazis and gay bashers who made repeated, direct, and public calls to harm specific and easily identifiable groups.
I agree. Misgendering someone isn’t hate speech and wouldn’t even come close to meeting the standard the Canadian supreme court has set. Since the group needs to be readily and easily identifiable, it could even be argued transgender people aren’t protected from hate speech at all.
Blamemeta@lemm.ee 6 months ago
On the freedom thing, its more about the government is forbidden from doing and not what it does. Afaik, no other country says that the government can not abridge rights.
Because unpopular speech is the speech that would get hit first. Especially if its unpopular for a reason.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 6 months ago
For the most part we can.
You can argue for hours which system is better and both sides have good points.
I believe in free speech. While I often hear things I don’t like. At least I live in country where I can hear both sides.