Comment

Comment on Every game developer company should be like this

I have to mention the single game I know of that doesn’t follow the model. Path of Exile is completely F2P, all microtransactions are purely cosmetic. Some argue you need to purchase more stash tabs than the base four the game comes with, but I think if you’re playing enough to need more tabs, it may be worth it to buy.

For me, I wanted to supports the devs, so I have a ridiculous amount of skins, pets, and portals from supporter packs, which have no bearing on your character.

And there is a new league/expansion every three months for free. That’s why it’s been kicking Diablos arse for years.

source

Sort:hotnew top

woodytrombone@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

all microtransactions are purely cosmetic. Some argue you need to purchase more stash tabs

Ah, yes. The ““purely cosmetic”” stash tabs that are required to participate in selling items in any meaningful capacity.

I’d rather buy PoE and have the full game as intended than be nickel-and-dimed to be able to trade for gear.

source
Liz@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
StarCraft is also F2P cosmetic only, as far as I remember. I haven’t played in about ten years though, before they went F2P so I could be wrong.

Mech Arena is F2P with some items behind a paywall, but it’s so few that you don’t really have to worry about it. It’s honestly a very simple and fun game without any need to pay. MAYBE I’ll run into a problem a few years from now when I’m so leveled up that I’m competing against people who put hundreds of dollars into the game, but it’s pretty clear that if that becomes a problem it’s a long way off.

The F2P model can be done wrong, and it can be done right.

source
TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I keep hearing good things about Path of Exile, though its a bit too complex for me. That might be one of the rare acceptable ones.

Focusing on cosmetics is generally the least offensive way to go about it although even that has its uglier side, such as Valve’s games relying on lootboxes and profiting from the trade of rare items at exorbitant prices. Whenever random chance and lootboxes are brought up, that is still targeting players with compulsive tendencies. All digital scarcity and rarity is artificial, after all. There is no reason why they couldn’t straight up sell an unlimited amount of sparkly hats and fancy gun skins. We could dismiss this as unimportant if it doesn’t affect the core gameplay but it’s still morally dubious if a game is being funded through the exploitation of a fraction of the audience.

There is another important caveat that cosmetics are not an issue as long as that is not a significant aspect of the game. Selling cosmetics in a Diablo-like is no big deal. Including cosmetic lootboxes, say, Animal Crossing Pocket Camp, an All Ages game largely about decoration, is absolutely egregious, because in such a game there is no separating cosmetics from gameplay.

source
- nepenthes@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  While I agree lootboxes are shite, and was dismayed when they brought them in, you can have them turned off in PoE if you have a compulsive/gambling issue (email support and they disable the purchase). Also, anything in a lootbox goes to the shop after the league ends, so you can just purchase the item. They also give a crap tonne of skins as challenge rewards for leagues, so you always be stylin’.
  
  As for difficulty-- it has a steep learning curve! But once you get your sea legs (and later, Path of Building; free, community run) it’s impossible to go back to something like Diablo, imo. The intricacy and constant new leagues are the only reasons I’m still playing it seven years later :)
  
  source