Remember, this is a global general-purpose instance with a wide variety of backgrounds and worldviews.
With that in mind, I think I should have the choice to see information if I want to—even if someone else determines that it is incorrect, right?
From my perspective, you can learn extremely valuable things from the corrupt (the horrific history of my country for example) just as much as the good. Removing information like this effectively removes my ability to see the full picture. By definition, this is censorship. It is removing content based on someone’s opinion of the content itself.
If your going to tell me that your definition of disinformation is 100% truth, I’d love to hear how you got to that conclusion.
mojo@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Yes, and that’s why I signed up for it. Feel free to not join lol.
JimBean@lemm.ee 10 months ago
This is the logical stance. If I wanted random busybodies deciding what I see because they think they’re the only ones wise enough to discern truth from lies, I’d join Facebook.