Comment on Supreme Court stays out of fight over transgender student bathroom access
BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 8 months agoRe-read the text.
In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County, 140 S. Ct. 1731, that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity constitutes discrimination
SCOTUS already affirmed Title VII applies to Gender AND Sex.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 8 months ago
I am aware but that is SCOTUS creating law which is the same issue with Roe VS Wade.
I think you are slowly catching on to the issue. The courts have not been consistent and as such they need to clarify. If you remember the case, people were surprised Gorsuch voted the way he did but it is consistent with his beliefs.
I think the court was incorrect in its ruling using the Civil Rights Act. The Civil Rights Act does not cover this topic. As such congress needed to amend it to cover sexuality or gender identity.
Otherwise, we have courts making laws which I am against. Alito spoke out that since it was defined, it wasn’t protected.
I am not against the protections, but I am against the courts writing law. If you haven’t read the case, I would suggest doing so as you will see the issue. They defined sex as orientation or identity which is not how the word was ever used.
This is exactly why Roe was overturned.
The correct way to fix this is congress has to pass a law.
Pepsi@kbin.social 8 months ago
must be exhausting
the amount of mental gymnastics you are doing, i mean.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Instead of trolling. Why not Contribute something. My explanation is spot on. Where do you disagree ?