Comment on Supreme Court stays out of fight over transgender student bathroom access

PizzaMane@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Funny, that isn’t what the article is about but thanks for not reading it.

  For some reason, liberals always want to talk about people’s genitals. What is your obsession with licking boots and thinking of other people’s genitals?

  source

  • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    If the article isn’t about genitals than what is it about? What’s the harm in using gender-affirming bathrooms if you take genitals out of the equation?

    source

    • wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Why are you asking me when i stated no opinion that there is harm. You’re projecting a view on me I didn’t suggest.

      I don’t have a strong opinion one way or the other. I’m a man. One my coworkers is a trans man. He just goes to the stall and does his business.

      I get the concern women may have but that is an issue a woman would need to opine on.

      The general argument is safe spaces for women.

      It’s something scotus needs to address.

      source

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        You claim there is harm, what harm is there?

        You claim you don’t have a strong opinion, but you want the highest court in the land’s opinion on what should be a settled matter? Seems like you have a pretty strong opinion, you just don’t want to vocalize it.

        If you remove genitals and sex from the equation (something you said to do), what about gender-affirming bathrooms makes them an unsafe space for women? Because at this point we’re talking chromosomal differences and nothing else.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Pepsi@kbin.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        you need to supreme court to teach you about genitals?

        dude there’s tons of health textbooks.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • PizzaMane@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Funny, that isn’t what the article is about but thanks for not reading it.

    The article is about school policy of student’s use of their respective genders bathroom:

    “At issue was whether either the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which says that the laws apply equally to everyone, or Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in education, protects transgender students in that context.”

    It is absolutely what it is about.

    For some reason, liberals always want to talk about people’s genitals. What is your obsession with licking boots and thinking of other people’s genitals?

    Do you have anything better than a “no u”?

    source

    • wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      No. Do you not understand the difference between gender and sex? The school wants people to use the bathroom of their sex. Not their gender identity.

      Do you have anything better than a “no u”?

      Dude, you’re always talking about genitals and licking boots. It’s weird. Expect to be called out on it.

      So you disagree that scotus should address this issue? Or should it continue to be muddled

      source

      • PizzaMane@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Do you not understand the difference between gender and sex? The school wants people to use the bathroom of their sex. Not their gender identity.

        So in other words, it’s about genitals. Thanks for playing.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        “The school wants people to use the bathroom of their sex. Not their gender identity.”

        Oh ok so it IS about genitals lol. You just said it wasn’t.

        source

        • -> View More Comments