Comment on Why are so many countries in the world “developing” and poor, while essentially only Western countries have a high standard of living?

• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That might be a salient point, had anyone actually engaged the argument I actually made.

  I’m not mad, I’m just… disappointed. Nostalgic for rational, good faith discussion on old forums. Frustrated with the post-rational labyrinth of echo-chambers that the Internet seems to have become. Saddened by the apparent abandonment of sincere engagement in favor of sterile down votes. A bit heartbroken that maybe it was always this way and I was just young enough to ignore it, and lucky enough to find little temporary oases of respite over the years.

  But not mad, certainly not mad. Mad is groupthink down votes, truth by mindless consensus, rejection of discussion. I’m just… bleh. I saw this shit at Reddit, I thought this place would be better. But I think it’s just people, I don’t think it can be any different. I’m just… kinda done. Whatever, I don’t really care anymore. Bleh.

  source

  • atomicorange@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Quite a few people engaged with your argument. If you read back through the responses with a charitable eye you might be able to see it. Those who criticized you were ultimately trying to help you get your point across to others by suggesting you drop the part of your argument that addresses white supremacist talking points. That part of your argument was distracting and largely irrelevant to the conversation, and it made people think you were attempting to covertly inject racist ideas into the discussion (a common white supremacist tactic).

    source

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      If you read back through the responses with a charitable eye

      made people think you were attempting to covertly inject racist ideas into the discussion

      Yeah, this is the source of my disappointment, and this response is only more disappointing. You only expect nuanced, charitable perspective from one side, and that’s reasonable to you? I clarified multiple times, but some of the words look like an easily opposed argument I wasn’t making, so ignore those clarifications. Way easier to tear down an unrelated straw man than to engage with the nuanced position actually being presented.

      The Internet was a mistake. I’m done with these echo chambers. Thank you for the perspective.

      source

      • atomicorange@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Did I say I only expect nuance or charitable interpretation from one side? I expect it from both, but I’m not seeing it from you. I see people largely agreeing with you but begging you to reconsider the way you frame your argument. I see you responding only to the negative and evidently not even SEEING the positive responses. You might be right that the internet isn’t a good place for you, you seem ill-equipped to handle even gentle disagreement.

        source

        • -> View More Comments