Comment on Why do some websites have a "Continue Reading" button?

Spzi@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Doubt it. My web analytics indicate that bots click on every single element on the page, whether it makes sense or not.

  For this reason it’s a good idea not to allow your site to generate any kind of circular self-referential loop that can be achieved via navigation or clicking on things, because poorly coded bots will not realize that they’re driving themselves around in circles and proceed to bombard your server with zillions of requests per second for the same thing over and over again.

  Likewise, if you have any user initiated action that can generate an arbitrary result set like for example adding an item or set of items to a quote or cart, it is imperative that you set an upperbound limit on the length of result or request size (server side!), and ideally configure your server to temp-ban a client who attempts too many requests that are too large in too short of a time span. Because if you don’t bad bots absolutely will eventually attempt to e.g. create a shopping cart with 99999999999999999 items in it. Or a search query with 4.7 gigabytes worth of keywords. Or whatever. Either because they’re coded by morons or worse, because they’re coded by someone who wants to see if they can break your site by doing stuff like that.

  source

  • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    it’s a good idea not to allow your site to generate any kind of circular self-referential loop that can be achieved via navigation or clicking on things

    Don’t nearly all sites have a logo at the top that will take you back to the homepage? I’m not really following.

    My intuition is that the only safe solution is to rate limit requests; a poorly coded bot could definitely just be a while loop for the same URL ad infinitum.

    source