They could stay in hostels, re-purposed disused buildings or camps of some sort. Why do they get to stay at £100/ night hotels in fancy areas?
Comment on Man admits asylum seeker hotel petrol bomb attack
SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk 2 hours agoWhere else do you suggest, without building concentration camps?
SpokeFace653@feddit.uk 2 hours ago
mlcgdrhu@sopuli.xyz 58 minutes ago
You’re barking up the wrong tree on Lemmy with that kinda thought. People here would prefer they stay in 5–star hotels, be given multiple wives and triple benefits for five lives.
YerLam@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
The value of a hotel stay includes a lot more than the stripped back services these people have access to, it’s not like they are on holiday, and they’re in rooms not meant to accommodate families or extended stays which can make it an unpleasant experience, not whatever you’re imagining.
Hostels have even less infrastructure to deal with people in them or deal with government bureaucracy that goes with any of these programs.
Camps like ex army bases have been suggested and I think even trialled but have their own issues, soldiers will put up with the bare minimum and the bases are no longer fit to provide that.SpokeFace653@feddit.uk 1 hour ago
If soldiers can put up with the bare minimum, then so can they.
mjr@infosec.pub 24 minutes ago
Soldiers are treated better than detained migrants and despite that, there have been court cases over mistreatment of soldiers in army bases.
Armand1@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Cam you imagine staying in a hostel for literally months? With children?
SpokeFace653@feddit.uk 1 hour ago
Yes, i can. I’ve done it, and had to pay. Why can’t they?
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 hour ago
Why can’t they
What is it that you think a “refugee” actually is?
YerLam@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Why can’t the people who have nothing pay for a hotel?
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 hour ago
I think the person you replied to would love to put people like this in concentration camps