I’m OK with more prequels if it means letting Terry Matalas continue handling the post-TNG timeline.
maegul@lemmy.ml 11 months ago
Anyone else bothered by yet another prequel? Enterprise, Kelvin films, Discovery (s1-2), strange new worlds … there’s clearly a hesitancy to do something new right?
beefcat@beehaw.org 11 months ago
maegul@lemmy.ml 11 months ago
I’m with you.
The fun thing about the Matalas post-TNG/legacy thing for me is that it nicely straddles the line between being new and nostalgic. Seven would be captain and a whole bunch of other stuff too would be new, but still connected to the TNG era past.
ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 11 months ago
It doesn’t bother me at all, because I don’t think a fictional universe needs to have a “default” setting.
maegul@lemmy.ml 11 months ago
Aren’t prequels the default setting? What trek have we had since voyager that didn’t have a Spock or Soong in it?
ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 11 months ago
Lower Decks, Prodigy, Picard, late-period Discovery…is that enough? Should I continue?
maegul@lemmy.ml 11 months ago
There are more?
But to dig into this …
Which leaves Lower Decks and Prodigy … which are by my reckoning the two relatively universally appreciated Trek projects since Voyager (at least amongst those that have watched them) … which I would claim is not a coincidence (not that we all have to like the same things).
They’re both animated too which I feel exemplifies the risk-aversion modern Trek production has to “new” projects/characters etc.