Comment on Firefox’s new ad tries to remind you of a time before the internet sucked.

• artyom@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Go on and…back up the thing you said with some facts somewhere?

  source

  • pimento64@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    You need sources that a browser extension has more features than a browser’s built-in feature? This is not debate club. Point your eyeballs at the screen.

    source

    • artyom@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      What “screen”?

      If you don’t want to provide sources, that’s your prerogative. But don’t expect not to be treated like a fool for it.

      source
  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Not the person you replied to but copied directly from ublockorigin.com

    Lite vs. full uBlock Origin

    Choose Lite when…

    • You use current Chrome or Safari.
    • You want filtering modes with relatively little setup.
    • Its browser-supported filters cover the sites you visit.

    Choose full uBO when…

    • You use Firefox on desktop or Android.
    • You need dynamic filtering, the request logger, or advanced per-site controls.
    • You rely on filter syntax that Lite cannot support.

    source

    • artyom@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I don’t know what that has to do with the conversation. For the third time, we’re talking about a native implementation. Not an extension.

      source

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        This is a bit of a miscommunication. But an extension is not native. And all version of Ubo are extensions, something else doesnt exist.

        You can define native a few different ways in english language so i get how it might be confusing if its not your first, but its similar to how a mod for a game is not native to the game.

        When you mentioned “native adblock” in chromium. That does exists and it requires no extension. But there never as fully featured as the full Ubo extension which only works on firefox.

        I hope that helps.

        source

        • -> View More Comments