Comment on Social media lobby group sues US State for protecting children from Meta, TikTok and Snapchat

t3rmit3@beehaw.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• conciselyverbose@kbin.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I absolutely agree, but "you need parental consent to have an account" doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

  source

  • regul@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    If you take it at face value, which you should really never do when conservatives are involved.

    By my estimation, this (and bills like it) are intended to do two things:

    1. Reduce younger people’s access to points of view outside of the US political mainstream. In particular, Republican politicians seem very convinced that TikTok is turning kids gay/trans/atheist/communist/etc.
    2. Allow for aggrieved conservatives to extract money via lawsuit from corporations Republican politicians view as hostile to them. Because laws like this will obviously be circumvented, and these laws are written such that the platform is liable in these cases, these laws open them up to potentially millions of lawsuits every time a teenager gets an Instagram account.

    source
  • JCPhoenix@beehaw.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Doesn’t COPPA already require this for children under 13? This state bill raises it to under 16.

    I guess it comes down to the particulars. Is there something more onerous in the Ohio bill than in COPPA? Because I don’t think I’ve heard of any company seriously getting mad that COPPA is a thing.

    source

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      You'd think if it was they'd be pointing to that.

      As far as I'm concerned "you must have parental consent until 18" is perfectly legitimate, because you can't really sign contracts or fully legally consent until then.

      source