Reminds me of how many early indie games relied on procedural generation but people got tired of it over time.
Comment on Valve: Most games made with AI tools are now welcome on Steam
DdCno1@beehaw.org 10 months agoI wouldn’t be surprised if, in just a few years time, pre-AI-era content of all kinds, not just games, ends up becoming cherished by people, to the point that entire fandoms and subcultures develop around preserving and promoting it.
TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 10 months ago
ampersandrew@kbin.social 10 months ago
Plenty of games still rely on procedural generation to different degrees. It's a huge selling point in many cases, and in others, it's a pillar of their genre.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
You mean like how people cherish hand drawn animation over digital? Cause except for some niche projects, the majority don’t.
callouscomic@lemm.ee 10 months ago
People shit on the Hobbit trilogy for the CGI compared to the live action of the LOTR trilogy. This stuff does happen.
bear@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
This is no different than anything else, we naturally appreciate the skill it takes to create something entirely by hand, even if mass production is available.
DdCno1@beehaw.org 10 months ago
I feel like this is different. Even something mass produced using machinery used to be always designed by a human in the end.
bear@slrpnk.net 10 months ago
The games will still be designed by humans. Generative AI will only be used as a tool in the workflow for creating certain assets faster, or for creating certain kinds of interactivity on the fly. It’s not good enough to wholesale create large sets of matching assets, and despite what folks may think, it won’t be for a long time, if ever. Not to mention, people just don’t want that. People want art to have intentional meaning, not computer generated slop.