Comment

Comment on Goteem

But they didn’t have texts in the 1800s

Yes, this is what makes it a joke. Because the only difference is the format that’s changed, while the racial sensibilities are about the same.

Chinese exclusionary act not anti scamming propaganda.

Hey now, if you get to define your racist charicature in your own terms, don’t you think you should let them do so to? I’m sure the Workingmen’s Party of California would say that it’s just “anti-capitalist” propaganda, the capitalists being the ones who let those damn Chinese come in and take out jobs.

Of course, it’s bullshit in both cases.

I take it you’re a fan of Taiwan and its sovereignty then?

What does Taiwan have to do with anything?

source

Sort:hotnew top

Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Is English your first language?

source
- Objection@lemmy.ml ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Yes.
  
  source
  - Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    charicature isn’t a word.
    
    source
    Objection@lemmy.ml ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    My mistake.
    
    You’re looking for caricature and not only can you not spell it but you clearly don’t know what it means.
    
    Well let’s see. Say you depict a Chinese person as
    
    A scammer
    
    Someone who gets so triggered at the mention of Taiwan that they drop everything else
    
    Someone who spells “fuck” like “fuk”
    
    I would say that that fits the definition pretty damn well.
    
    Everything else you’ve said is also false
    
    Ooh, neat line. Everything else you said is false too. Real time saver.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments