Comment on Goteem

• Objection@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  But they didn’t have texts in the 1800s

  Yes, this is what makes it a joke. Because the only difference is the format that’s changed, while the racial sensibilities are about the same.

  Chinese exclusionary act not anti scamming propaganda.

  Hey now, if you get to define your racist charicature in your own terms, don’t you think you should let them do so to? I’m sure the Workingmen’s Party of California would say that it’s just “anti-capitalist” propaganda, the capitalists being the ones who let those damn Chinese come in and take out jobs.

  Of course, it’s bullshit in both cases.

  I take it you’re a fan of Taiwan and its sovereignty then?

  What does Taiwan have to do with anything?

  source

  • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Is English your first language?

    source

    • Objection@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Yes.

      source

      • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        charicature isn’t a word.

        source

        • -> View More Comments