i have the strong feeling they want to mock us by publishing it as pdf, the data in columns. like come on! is there a worse format?
jpg?
Comment on Did 9/11 cause a statistically visible "anti-babyboom"?
7EP6vuI@feddit.org 1 week ago
i have the strong feeling they want to mock us by publishing it as pdf, the data in columns. like come on! is there a worse format?
just from looking at it i’m searching for a reason why the first monday in september is low on births both in 2001 and 2002?
i feel like you would have to look at more years than those two to remove seasonal effects that take place every year.
i have the strong feeling they want to mock us by publishing it as pdf, the data in columns. like come on! is there a worse format?
jpg?
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You should be looking at June birthdays. Those are people conceived in Sept.
September birthdays are the result of December holiday parties. Trust me, I have 3 kids with Sept birthdays.