Comment on Target
gegil@sopuli.xyz 2 days agoI also wonder that, because even if assuming if it was consentual, no sane person would have sex without protection.
Edit: accidentally posted as separate comment, instead of reply.
Comment on Target
gegil@sopuli.xyz 2 days agoI also wonder that, because even if assuming if it was consentual, no sane person would have sex without protection.
Edit: accidentally posted as separate comment, instead of reply.
Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
Well it wouldn’t be consensual if she would not disclose a known std to her partner when engaging in unprotected sex.
For the same reason, “stealthing” is rape. Or “surprise analsex” is rape. Any deviation from what was consented to, is rape, especially if the intention was to misguided the victim.
Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 days ago
You assume it’s a her, but it could go both ways
Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
Fair. My bad.
gegil@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
This is what i mean. It is okay for people to have unptotected sex, but only if both people consent to it, and if they understand the risks of stds and pregnancy. This is why unprotected sex without understanding those risks is rape, even if people did consent.